I’ve heard it called the “omnicause”: the large cluster of distinct issues that are routinely lumped together in trendy progressive political campaigning — trans rights, Palestine, global warming, anti-racism and all the rest of it. Greta Thunberg, for example, who rose to fame seven years ago warning us that we had only five years before disaster, appears to have shifted her focus from climate catastrophe to Palestine, recently setting sail on the “Gaza flotilla” for the second time. Even if a protest or demonstration is ostensibly about welfare cuts or exploitation of workers, there will invariably be placards in the crowd expressing concern with something else. It often seems as though these matters are bundled together as a kind of package deal. You are expected to buy into them as a group, because — supposedly — they are all linked, all about liberation from the oppressive social and economic structures imposed by the rich, white heteropatriarchy. In this view, it makes no sense to engage with one of them and not the others. Everything has to be about everything all the time.
11:06 AM
The Catholic omnicause and the danger of false equivalence
Calls for a “consistent life ethic” often merge every moral issue into one cause. Yet in Catholic teaching, not all issues carry the same moral weight.
Niall Gooch

Already a subscriber? Sign in
5freearticles every month
Continue reading with a free account. No card needed.
- Five free articles every thirty days, on any device you sign in on
- The Catholic Herald newsletter, every morning
- Subscribe whenever you like for everything: every article and the magazine

subscribe to the catholic herald today
Our best content is exclusively available to our subscribers. Subscribe today and gain instant access to expert analysis, in-depth articles, and thought-provoking insights—anytime, anywhere. Don’t miss out on the conversations that matter most.
Subscribe











