People living in nursing homes are not being permitted the same level of freedom and choice as their fellow Americans. Due to spread in the community, it is commonplace for nursing homes to identify asymptomatic cases through routine testing of staff. With each positive test the nursing homes must suspend visitation for a period of time and place affected units in isolation for at least 14 days. In New York, where routine testing is conducted twice weekly, these cases arise frequently. In an excess of caution, health authorities sometimes require the facility to confine not only residents of affected units, but all residents to their rooms every time a positive case is identified.
In this situation, an 85-year-old resident with dementia -- who is fully vaccinated and asymptomatic -- is often still required to be isolated in her room after an asymptomatic member of her nursing home staff tests positive. She is not allowed “to visit a neighbor or participate in a music program with other nursing homes residents,” much less her family and friends, even if they are also fully vaccinated. The Hastings Center report notes that the CDC offers safe visitation and socialization guidelines for this population outside of a nursing home—but this guidance is in “stark contrast” to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidance for the very same population living in nursing homes. The Center describes the “significant disparity” as “problematic and unjust.” I’ll go even further: it is abuse -- straight-up-no-chaser -- and there is no longer even so much as a gossamer justification for it, given the efficacy of the vaccines and the vulnerable of these populations to isolation. The Hastings Center uses utilitarian language to describe what is going on here -- claiming that it is “doing more harm than good.” But that is far too weak a description. What is going on here is a dramatic violation of the fundamental human rights of those who have been most vulnerable during the pandemic. Deciding that seniors who are fully vaccinated must still remain isolated constitutes that kind of abuse which violates fundamental human rights. That is, it violates the fundamental right of these human beings to associate with other human beings. That is, the kind of association which makes life livable in the first place: for we are social creatures made to exist in relationship with others. In fact, the abuse is so transparent that I believe one is forced to wonder whether the populations in nursing homes are being treated the same as other kinds of human beings. In a new book coming out this July, I argue that our current secularized culture -- which only values human beings who also happen to be fully rational and self-aware creatures -- cannot count human beings with dementia as full persons. Half of all nursing home residents have dementia. That means our current cultural climate is one in which half the people living in nursing homes don't really even count as people. If nothing is done to reclaim the idea that human beings have value because of their being made in the image and likeness of God, the next population to fall will be human beings with dementia living in nursing homes. When I set out writing, I thought that idea was a warning about where we were headed eventually. Given the abusive practices with which we continue to attack human beings with dementia -- even if they are fully vaccinated -- means that my book is more descriptive than predictive. We are, right now, apparently willing to look the other way on abuse of elderly people because we really don’t believe it is abuse of people who are “like us.” Our abandonment of the notion of human equality founded on participation in the divine image is already too much to bear. It has only begun to make itself felt in its effects.










